Vitalik Buterin Mocks Bitcoin “Stock-to-Flow” Model Amid Price Slump #Vitalik #Buterin #Mocks #Bitcoin #StocktoFlow #Model #Price #Slump Welcome to Lopoid
Vitalik Buterin took to Twitter today to criticize the infamous stock-to-flow Bitcoin model popularized by the pseudonymous investor PlanB.
The model famously predicted that Bitcoin would hit a price of $100,000 by December 2021, inviting criticism after it was invalidated by the market.
Buterin pointed out that if PlanB’s model was applied to Ethereum following its “Merge” upgrade, its price would be a surreal number that doesn’t “exist” in nature.
Share this article
Ethereum inventor Vitalik Buterin has described the infamous Bitcoin stock-to-flow model as “harmful,” saying that flawed financial models “deserve all the mockery they get.”
Vitalik Buterin Slates PlanB’s Stock-to-Flow Model
Vitalik Buterin has taken shots at the Bitcoin stock-to-flow model that gained popularity over the course of the 2021 bull run.
Stock-to-flow is really not looking good now.
I know it’s impolite to gloat and all that, but I think financial models that give people a false sense of certainty and predestination that number-will-go-up are harmful and deserve all the mockery they get. https://t.co/hOzHjVb1oq pic.twitter.com/glMKQDfSbU
— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) June 21, 2022
The Ethereum co-founder took to Twitter today to criticize the infamous, now invalidated model popularized by the pseudonymous Dutch investor PlanB. “Stock-to-flow is really not looking good now,” he said, adding that “financial models that give people a false sense of certainty and predestination that number-will-go-up are harmful and deserve all the mockery they get.” In voicing his criticism, Buterin was quote tweeting the independent Ethereum educator and founder of The Daily Gwei podcast, Anthony Sassano, who said that PlanB’s model was “such an epic failure” that they should consider deleting their account.
The stock-to-flow model famously predicted that Bitcoin would hit $100,000 by December 2021 and attracted attention as the asset led a rally across the crypto market. It was first conceived by PlanB in a Mar. 2019 blog post titled “Modeling Bitcoin Value with Scarcity (S2F).” The article outlined a new way of valuing Bitcoin and predicting its price based on the relationship between the asset’s stock and flow, whereby the stock is the total size of the existing stockpiles or reserves of the asset, while the flow signifies the yearly production or coin issuance. Claiming that there was a statistically significant relationship between Bitcoin’s stock-to-flow ratio and its market price, the model forecasted Bitcoin’s price at $55,000 following its May 2020 halving event, and $100,000 by December 2021. “I will call s2f invalidated if we have not reached 100K by Dec this year, we can not stay at current levels for the rest of the year,” PlanB tweeted in June 2021, only to backtrack on his claim after Bitcoin failed to reach the forecasted target.
Stock-to-Flow Model Invalidated
Many notable industry figures have criticized PlanB and the stock-to-flow model in the past. Some have argued that it fails to account for price-influencing factors such as demand, while others have said that it is not backed by empirical evidence or scientific logic. In mocking the model’s flawed assumptions, Buterin highlighted in a follow-up tweet that if the model was applied to Ethereum following its “Merge” to Proof-of-Stake, the stock-to-flow ratio would be negative 55, meaning it would take around 55 years to burn all Ethereum in existence. This would give Ethereum a price of -47610 – 101177*i—a surreal number that doesn’t “exist” in nature.
PlanB responded to Buterin’s initial post on Twitter, calling out leaders who “fall victim to blaming others and playing the victim.”
The latest criticism of the stock-to-flow model comes as Bitcoin suffers from its eighth month of sluggish price action. The top crypto is currently trading for around $21,000, around five times below PlanB’s forecasted price target for June 2022.
Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author of this feature owned ETH and several other cryptocurrencies.
Share this article
The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.
You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.
See full terms and conditions.